Bible dating earth

For those Christians who believe that Genesis (like the other historical books of the Bible) should be understood as literal history, it has therefore been necessary to show the fallacies in the so-called "scientific proofs" of an old earth.Before the discovery of radioactivity, this usually meant arguing against the evidences from crustal cooling, sedimentation rates, or salt influx in the oceans.Lane, geology professor at Tufts University, as chairman.

bible dating earth-46

Therefore, there must be a true and satisfying answer to this troublesome radiometry problem.

The earth young, and the data must confirm this, if they are rightly understood.

The dating of rocks by the radioactive decay of certain minerals is undoubtedly the main argument today for the dogma of an old earth.

But the Bible clearly teaches a recent creation of both the heavens and the earth, so Christians have often tried to reinterpret this doctrine to accommodate the long ages required by radioactive dating.

We need to remind ourselves over and over that there is no hint whatever—anywhere in the Bible—that the earth is significantly older than the few thousand years of recorded history.

There are numerous Biblical statements, on the other hand, that clearly require a young earth.

In 1946 I enrolled for graduate work at the University of Minnesota, taking a minor in geology and spending much time in the geological library there and studying carefully the Annual Reports of the Committee on Geologic Time.

During this period, I also revised my 1946 book, deleting the discussion of the gap theory and expanding its critique of radiometric dating. They and others like them will accept literal creationism only when they are convinced that secular scientists believe it.

Have you ever asked: “How old is the earth according to the Bible? ” The only Old Testament chronological Bible Timeline that shows the Biblical inerrancy of over 1,300 dated events in Scripture.

Tags: , ,